As usual, I'm grateful to James Bach in commenting on my last post. in a wide-ranging statement, he defends the value of schools of thought. I agree entirely that schools of thought have value. Partly they allow one to compare and contrast aspects of a discipline, particularly where there are differences of opinion, thought, belief, behaviour etc. and heaven knows there's plenty of variety in that regard.
Paul Gerrard's blog
I have rejected the idea of schools, as defined by Bret here,
I have rejected the notion of me being A MEMBER OF MY OWN SCHOOL HERE.
Michael Bolton has revived the cold dead hand of schools in his talk at Eurostar 2008. Here is the presentation
This year, I've presented two talks on 'Past, Present and Future of Testing' at IBC Euroforum in Stockholm and 'Future of Testing' at SQC London. I thought it would be a good idea to write some notes on the 'predictions' as I'm joining some esteemed colleagues at a retreat this weekend, and we talk about futures much of the time.
You can download the paper from here.
The Twentieth Test Management forum took place on Wednesday 29th October at the conference centre at Balls's Brothers, Minster Pavement.
We are most grateful to our sponsors.
Many, many thanks for the invitation to speak and the hospitality of the Dansk-IT Test Manager Klub. A very welcoming audience for my 'traditional' pitch on Contracts and Testing and also the discussion on Axioms and Agile. Thank-you.
You can see the Axioms talk and paper here. The Agile Contracts slides are attached to this post. Also, the Axioms Worksheet I used in the session.
For some time, I've been registered on Linkedin ( http://www.linkedin.com and found it useful to make contact with past colleagues and as a source of contacts in our community.
I've added a new Linkedin group called, unsurprisingly, Test Management Forum. There are only a handful of members so far, but it's early days. Being a member of a group is useful if you want to make contact and connect with other people.
I'm an optimistic sort of fellow and I really thought that promotions like this:
... were fewer and further between in our industry.
Now I know it's foolish to think that technical people (with experience and relevant knowledge) will ever write marketing blurb (so it is credible), but it stil pains me to read this sort of thing.
"Top 10 Reasons to Implement Automated Application Quality Management"
I'm a big fan of Dr Ben Goldacre's 'Bad Science' site and I commend it, if you appreciate good science and have a view on health matters. (You don't???)
A recent post I meant to mention in my blog earlier covers... Cool Science Toys.
Take a look. The Phun 2D Physics Sandbox toy is quite superb. I wish I was five years old all over again.
Comment's on Ben's blog introduce some other spectacular 'toys'.
Check this out...
Colin Robb of HP asked me to take part in a live, interactive webcast which took place on 21 November 2007.
Co-panellist Paul Herzlich joined Colin and myself and we spent an interesting hour or so presenting three views and taking some Q&A.
The webcast was part of HP's launch of Quality Center 9.2 which can now be used to support the Project Intelligence approach I've been advocating for the last few years.
Simplistically, QC can be configured to provide coverage targets in three dimensions.