Paul Gerrard's blog

Post Agilism - an apology to Jonathan Kohl

About a year or so ago I posted a Mr Angry challenge to a blog post by Jonathan Kohl. It was a grumpy complaint about a post of his description of the 'post-agilist' er, situation. A year ago, I was interested in what was happening but was no better informed at the blogs that talked of post-agilism. The grumpy post didn't achieve much except a bit of criticism of myself (but not much really ... ner ner).

I should therefore, have withdrawrn the offending post some time ago - but real life gets in the way and I didn't. I apologise to Jonathan Kohl whole-heartedly. Sorry mate. :-)

Clients, Contexts and Schools

There's been a lively discussion on axioms of testing and the subject of schools came up in that conversation. I'm not a member of any particular school and if people like to be part of one - good for them. I think discussion of schools is a distraction and doesn't help the axioms debate at all. I do suggest that axioms are context- and school- independent - so with respect to schools of testing, I had better explain my position here.

Does a set of irrefutable test axioms exist?

This post is superceded by the book:

The Tester's Pocketbook

The latest (and all future) definitions of the axioms will appear here:

Test Axioms Website.

Is it possible to define a set of axioms that provide a framework for testing that all the variations of test approach currently being advocated align with or obey? In this respect, an axiom would be an uncontested principle; something self-evidently and so obviously true and not requiring proof. What would such test axioms look like?

Testing Tags: 

Launch of Aqastra

For the past fifteen or more years, a significant amount of the onsite training we've done for clients has been oriented towards teaching business users to become acceptance testers. Typically, clients ask for a 1-2 day introduction to the basics and some practice in creating and running tests. In most cases the client wants to introduce their people to some structure and method so they can be joined by some professional testers and led by an experienced test manager. On occasion, we've been asked to lead these teams.


With most humble apologies to Rudyard Kipling...

If you can test when tests are always failing,
When failing tests are sometimes blamed on you,
If you can trace a path when dev teams doubt that,
Defend your test and reason with them too...

This post has moved to Paul's blog here

Testing Tags: 

How did Project Intelligence get started?

As part of an interview for the Empirix QAZone website, I was asked a series of questions. Here's one of them and my answer.

"Paul, you devised a very interesting concept of “Project Intelligence”, a corresponding framework and a course on this topic. How would you define it, and also can you share with QAZone a little about how it “started”?"

Advice to New and Experienced Testers

As part of an interview for the Empirix QAZone website, I was asked a series of questions. Here's one of them and my answer.

"What are some of the recommendations that you have for folks starting a career in testing/QA there? Also, do you have any tips that you could share with some of our “newbie” QAZone member to help them prepare for growth and success?"

Testing Tags: